It was a rainy day. Only two competitors showed up. My
robot (now named "FLASH") and the other guy. It was an exciting
event, and I wish I had more time to get to know the other guy and his
robot but I found that the event was more intense than I had
expected. I had my head in my laptop trying to get the route
programmed into the thing. I built my route and then futzed
around programming it in.
I wasn't thinking competitively, and was trying the full rout
looking for all 3 of the cones. Today I realize that I should
have just gone for the last cone, taking the safest rout for my
robot. Thats not what I did. However; I did learn a lot of
things and had a good time. Flash came in second. (and
last) The rest of this page attempts to document the event and
what happened from my perspective. I WILL be back next year, and
I'm going to improve my design and enter the Seattle event this fall.
First off, it was RAINING! I showed up at 10am and set up my
shelter, table, laptop, power supply and got ready to update my python
program defining my route, and make a run for the cones. The
following is the input data I could have used but didn't have the
sophisticated geodetic computations figured out in time. :
| way point |
Coordinates |
multiplier |
| start |
N45deg 30.622min W 122deg
41.141min |
|
| cone 1 |
N45deg 30.649min W 122deg 41.140min | 0.8 |
| cone 2 |
N45deg 30.678min W 122deg 41.134min | 0.5 |
| finish |
N45deg 30.688min W 122deg 41.126min |
The first impression I had of the route was "oo, thats a really long". The longest rout I've done so far was 16m. I ended up taking a compass and a odometer and walking off a 9 way point route of (heading, distance) pairs.
My field notes where:
H1= 302, D1 = 33.4m
H2 = 0, D2 = 5.3m
cone
H3 = 308, D3 = 32.7m
H4 = 350, D4 = 17.5m
H5 = 13, D5 = 9.8m
H6 = 70, D6 = 4.1m
cone
H7 = 240 D7= 3.4m
H8 = 342 D8 = 15.2m
H9 = 20 D9 = 3.1m
cone
Next I converted these magnetic headings into a differential heading
off of what I was hoping would by my initial heading.
Looking back on this I should have seen a huge issue right off the
bat. (I don't have a good excuse, and if you knew my employment
history you'd be right to give me a big ass dope slap. Sorry
Mike...). Given the way my robot currently works to track
distance and heading. (no off track error computations yet) this
is equivalent to a 9 bank pool shot. Its just not going to work
out well. Also given the known errors and system noise, my
strategy was flawed.
Next I used pencil and paper to convert these into delta and
distance (in cm) for programming into the robot. From my notes I
have:
d1 = 0 D1 = 3340
d2 = 58 D2 = 530
cone
d3= 6 D3 = 3270
d4 = 48 D4 = 1750
d5 = 65 D5 = 980
d6 = 128 D6 = 410
cone
d7 = -62 D7 = 340
d8 = 40 D8 = 152 <-- yipes this is 10x too
short! should be 1520
d9 = 78 D9 = 310
I did check my work 2 times and I recall catching one fat-finger
error on d5, as I programmed in the data.
Next I programmed the following into my robot's python program for the
route:
What actually happened was that it never got past ROUTE_INDEX =
1000. Every time it drifted over and, ever so slightly clipped
the high curb that was bounding the side walk I was trying to shoot the
robot down. Hitting the curb triggered the bump sensor, which at
this time is an un-recoverable condition. Another reason
to only go to the last cone. Again what was I thinking?
Trying to do all the cones, that was nu-reasonable. To be a bit
fair, I didn't realize it was an nu-recoverable condition unit the
first crash into the curb. Then I had a bad feeling, but damn it,
I wanted to see if I could shoot my robot down that long 33.4m sidewalk
and I was going to try at least one more time.
I tried a second time this time hit the wall a few meters down from
the last hit.
I tried a third time I came within 2 meters of clearing the wall
:( ending my attempts.
Later I ran a fourth time as a debug attempt. Here I manually
moved the robot away from the wall's and obstacles to see what it would
do if I allowed it to just keep going. Here I found the robot
ended up 109feet away from the final cone. the 15M error seen
above isn't big enough to explain that. I also saw some turns
that didn't "seem" to be what was expected. I didn't have the
tools (and it was raining) with me to mark off the actual heading
changes, but I'll go back next weekend to gather that data. There
may well be a bug in my heading error logic, or odometer y bug or
hardware problem with my motor encoder..... I want to understand
what happened and why so I can move forward.
I'll be putting up a new page to log the "up-grades" and my new TODO
list for the Seattle event shortly.
All in all it was a very fun and learning experience. The
following are pictures form the big day:

My "pit area" (boy I'm sure glad I brought that pop-up)

Attempting to correct for the drift into the curb. Using a cross
over cable to SSH into the NSLUG computer that was executing the python
route program.




